Clinical performance of implant supported mandibular overdentures with cantilever bar and stud attachments: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of edentulous patients with implant-supported over-dentures improves denture's retention and stability. Published data concerning implant-supported overdenture with cantilever bars that claimed that can affect the survival and bone loss of implants are scarce. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate 5-year clinical performance of mandibular implant-supported over-dentures with different attachment systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 103 patients who had received mandibular over-dentures supported by two implants were evaluated in a 5-year follow up. Studied groups were patients with Spherblock ball attachment (58 patients), Dolder bar with cantilever (36 patients), and Locator attachment (9 patients). Marginal bone-loss around implants, prosthetic complications, soft tissue status of the implants (gingival index, plaque index, pocket depth, and bleeding on probing) were used to compare studied groups. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) criteria was used to assay patient's satisfaction. One-way ANOVA, Scheffe, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, and Fisher's exact tests, were used for the data analysis (α = 0.05). RESULTS: One hundred and three patients (46 male, 57 female, mean age 64.7 ± 8.6) with 206 implants (Strauman) were studied. The implant survival rate was 100% with mean bone loss of 0.22 mm around implants in 5 years. Prosthetic complications including attachment wear and denture fracture occurred more often with ball attachments. The number of attachment replacement, and post insertion appointments were significantly less in patients with bar attachments (p < 0.05). Pocket depth and gingival index were less in the ball attachment (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Mandibular overdenture supported by two implants can be considered a successful treatment in edentulous patients. The frequency of prosthetic complication is higher in unsplinted than splinted superstructures.

Five year clinical outcomes of metal ceramic and zirconia-based implant-supported dental prostheses: A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: The implant-supported restorations can be made of all-ceramic materials. The purpose of this study was to compare five year clinical outcomes of zirconia-based and metal ceramic implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). METHODS: In this study, 114 posterior implant-supported FDPs including zirconia-based (52) or metal ceramic (62) restorations were made for 114 patients with a mean age of 59 ±â€¯8.4 years and evaluated in a 5 year follow up. The modified California Dental Association (CDA) guidelines were used to assess the quality of the restorations. The soft tissue status was evaluated using gingival and plaque indices, probing depth and bleeding on probing. Additionally, the bone loss around implants was assessed by parallel priapical radiographs. The visual analogue scale was used regarding patients' satisfaction. The data analysis were performed by Kaplan-Meier, log rank test, Cox regression, Mann-Whitney U and Student's t-test. (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Five year Kaplan-Meier survival rate of the zirconia-based and metal ceramic FDPs were 98.1 % and 100 % respectively with no significant difference (P = 0.12). The success rates were 81.6 % for zirconia-based and 81.0 % for metal ceramic restorations (P = 0.85). The CDA rating of both studied groups was not significantly different except the marginal gap which was better in zirconia-based FDPs (P < 0.001). Fracture of veneering ceramics occurred in 2.7 % of metal ceramic and 6.4 % of zirconia-based FDPs, which were not considered as failure. Soft tissue status was not affected by the type of restorations except for plaque index which was more favorable for zirconia-based FDPs (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found between marginal bone loss of the two groups (P = 0.30 mesial, P = 0.46 distal). CONCLUSIONS: Zirconia-based and metal ceramic FDPs showed similar promising clinical performance in the 5-year follow-up. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Zirconia-based implant-supported FDPs might be a successful restorative method with acceptable survival rate and patient's satisfaction.